- Meet the Team
- Promotion & Tenure
- Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty
- Professional-Track: Professor Title Series
- Professional-Track: Clinical Professor Title Series
- 2025-26 Academic Year: Promotion and Tenure Resources
- Resource Library for Faculty
- Faculty Policies
- Faculty Review & Evaluations
- Faculty Annual Evaluations
- Mid-Probationary Review for Tenure-Track Faculty
- Comprehensive Periodic Review
- Faculty Engagement & Development
Connect with Us
Listen to the Latest Podcast:
The Effort Report with
Elizabeth Matsui and Roger Peng

The Effort Report features topics on life in academia. It’s micro-episodes series recently launched, covering academic craft topics such as promotion letters. Past episodes cover topics including collaboration, writing letters of recommendation, and revising a manuscript in response to a review.
Catch Up on the Latest Newsletter
Reach Out via Email
Departmental Faculty Academic Affairs Contacts
Email our team at dellmedfacultyaffairs@austin.utexas.edu
Mid-Probationary Review for Tenure-Track Faculty
The University of Texas at Austin is committed to providing faculty members with informative and meaningful feedback. It is especially important that tenure-track faculty undergo a review midway through their probationary service in order to assess if the faculty member is on a reasonable trajectory toward promotion and tenure.
The Dell Medical School, through a process determined by the Appointment, Promotion, & Tenure Committee (APT), will conduct a full review of the designated area of excellence, and overall progress of each tenure-track faculty member during the spring/summer of the third year of service.
Materials usually consist of, but are not limited to:
- an updated CV in Dell Medical School CV Template
- annual evaluation reports;
- a statement in the faculty member’s area of excellence;
- for Investigation and Inquiry as area of excellence: statement must include link to faculty member's NIH mean RCR index
- copies of publications and other evidence of scholarly productivity;
- a summary of teaching activities, if applicable;
- a summary of clinical activities, if applicable;
- a summary of research funding if applicable;
- a summary of academic and professional service;
- student and peer teaching, CME evaluations;
- summary of awards, if applicable;
- any other documentation that the faculty member wishes to include.
Approximate Procedural Timetable:
Fall (year 2) |
Office of Faculty Academic Affairs notifies Provost’s Office and the APT Committee Chair of the faculty members undergoing Mid-Probationary Review |
Fall (year 2) |
APT Committee Chair notifies the faculty members of impending Mid-Probationary Review and makes preparations to conduct the review. |
Spring (year 2) – Spring (year 3) |
Faculty member assembles materials to submit to the Office of Faculty Academic Affairs. |
April 15 (year 3) |
Faculty member submits materials to the Office of Faculty Academic Affairs. |
Summer (year 3) |
APT Committee conducts the Mid-Probationary Review. |
Summer (year 3) |
APT Committee Chair and Department Chair meet with the faculty member to provide the Mid-Probationary Review Summary. |
Process Overview
More Information
Available on the Provost’s Office Guidelines for Faculty Evaluation.
Questions? Reach out to your departmental contact or the Office of Faculty Academic Affairs.